^ This is one interpretation of the view laid out in Zipursky, Rights, Wrongs, and Recourse, supra note 17, at 23 (“When A shoots at B, he displays an attitude of extreme subjective indifference toward the physical and emotional well-being of all those, including C, who might be hit by his bullet.”). The Second Restatement might be understood as positing such a duty when it lays down that “[a]n actor is subject to liability to another for battery if (a) he acts intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the person of the other or a third person, or an imminent apprehension of such a contact, and (b) a harmful contact with the person of the other directly or indirectly results.” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 13 (A.L.I. 1965) (emphasis added). The more natural and plausible interpretation of this provision, however, is that it constitutes a pigeonhole liability rule under which the transferred intent victim can claim in battery although no duty to him (except a bare duty of non-injury) has been breached.
当地时间3月7日，以色列国防军发言人德夫林表示，以色列空军在过去一周对伊朗的空袭行动中投掷了超过7500枚炸弹。他指出，这相当于去年6月期间以色列袭击伊朗行动中投掷炸弹数量的两倍。
。关于这个话题，新收录的资料提供了深入分析
Copyright © 1997-2026 by www.people.com.cn all rights reserved。关于这个话题，新收录的资料提供了深入分析
Michael Robbins, president and CEO of AUVSI, a drone industry group, said lessons from the Middle East and Ukraine show that the U.S. must accelerate deployment of sophisticated counter-drone technologies, so “our forces can defend bases and populations without spending a million dollars to stop a $50,000 threat.”